Temperature Control Options

Heating

Option Advantage Disadvantage Environmental Impact
Electrical under floor heating
  • cheaper to install if put in during construction
  • simple
  • expensive to run
  • installed before floor laid
  • COP = 1
Electrical heater
  • cheap
  • not always present
  • storable
  • heats 1 point
  • uneven heat distribution
  • aesthetically unappealing
  • poor safety
  • not very powerful so takes longer to warm room
  • inconvenience of hauling in and out of storage
  • COP = 1
Solar power
  • no electricity consumption
  • no carbon footprint
  • large complicated setup (needs water pipes under floor, buffer tanks, solar panels, pumps and control systems)
  • expensive initial cost
  • maintenance
  • power still needed for pumps and controllers
  • COP = +-10
Gas Heater
  • no electrical point required
  • portable
  • gas fireplace heats 1 point
  • gas is more expensive than electricity per kWh of energy
  • dangerous
  • often wasteful – prone to small gas leaks
  • COP = 1
  • low carbon footprint
Air conditioning
  • good efficiency
  • all year round comfort – heating and cooling
  • only inconvenience is once off installation and then easily accessed and remote controlled
  • aesthetically appealing options
  • expensive installation and purchase cost
  • permanent visible fixture
  • maintenance
  • COP = 2.4 – 4.2
  • very low carbon footprint

Cooling

Option Advantage Disadvantage Environmental Impact
Ceiling fan
  • lower purchase cost
  • limited power consumption
  • noisy
  • circulates instead of actually cooling air
  • seasonal relevance – i.e. “cooling” only, no heating function
  • not very powerful
  • low impact
Natural ventilation
  • no power consumption
  • expensive house design
  • not reliable
  • insects and pests enter the room
  • inconsistent: dependent on outside air
  • none
Evaporative cooling (i.e. portables
  • low power consumption
  • lower purchase cost
  • can only cool air by a couple of degrees
  • uses water
  • only electrical heating
  • no individual zone control
  • ugly and cumbersome
  • uses water – need exposed  pipe to run to outside
  • low impact
Air conditioning
  • consistent performance
  • accurate temperature control
  • individual control
  • not dependent on outdoor conditions
  • can be fitted after building
  • aesthetic choices
  • options that offer improved air quality
  • expensive installation and purchase cost
  • permanent visible fixture
  • maintenance
  • uses electricity
  • most effective and efficient way to heat or cool a room
  • COP = 4.2 – 2.4